Knowing your Rights: The Appeals Process

          Now that we have discussed searches, the Customs demand and the pre-appeals process, we can go through the formal appeals process.

          You have received the Letter of Demand and you have decided to go with the internal appeals process with SARS Customs. Also, you have paid up all the amounts demanded which will include the outstanding duties, taxes, penalties and interest.

You will have 30 working days from the date of the Letter of Demand within which to lodge the first appeal.

          The first level of appeal is with the local Customs Branch Office which made the adverse decision. This is called the IAA (Internal Administrative Appeal) process.

If this fails, the second level of appeal will be with the Office of the Commissioner for the SARS. This is called the ADR (Alternate Dispute Resolution) appeals process. Your appeal may be mailed directly to the Commissioner’s Office or alternatively, it may be addressed via the local Customs Branch Office.

          You will have 30 working days after the IAA response letter (if unsuccessful) from SARS to appeal by ADR. In each instance, SARS is required to establish a separate and independent review committee known as the Appeals Committee. You may also (in addition to written representations) elect to make representations in person to the Appeals Committee.

          In some cases (prior to appealing) you might require SARS Customs to provide further explanations or reasons for a decision made. If so, you should, within the 30 working days in any instance, request reasons from SARS in writing. Going forward, extensions of the 30 working days within which to respond to an appeal may also be granted, upon request. A maximum of 15 calendar days may be provided.

          In the new legislation SARS will have 60 calendar days within which to respond to any appeal with a decision. The Commissioner may extend this by an additional 30 calendar days. If SARS does not respond with a decision within this timeframe, the case will automatically be won by the applicant.

          The period 16 December to 15 January (inclusive of both dates) are excluded in any periods of limitation.

          There is also provision for an Ombudsman in the new legislation.

          You are in any event advised to consult with a professional prior to attempting to appeal any matter by yourself.

          Anyone involved in the appeals process may at any time still decide to follow litigation. The period of time normally allowed for litigation following the last decision made by SARS (whether in or outside of the internal appeals process) is 12 months.

          However, there are additional time constraints involved in this process which relates to the PAJA (Promotion of Administrative Justice Act) number 3 of 2000. Traders are advised to consult with a Customs Attorney in advance. Litigation however is normally reserved as a last resort.

Knowing your Rights: The Pre-Appeals Process

          Appeals with SARS Customs follow a logical process. The process was designed to comply with legislative requirements such as PAJA (Promotion of Administrative Justice Act) number 3 of 2000 and the Customs legislation.

          It is not frowned upon therefore to challenge the authority if you have a disagreement. You also do not need to concern yourself with any fear of reciprocity of additional audits. The days of old are long gone. On the contrary in fact, SARS Customs encourages their clients to follow the appeals process.

          The new Customs legislation makes provision for a lower order of appeals termed a “reconsideration of decision”. The process explained in the following paragraph will explain this to some degree.

          The first step after an assessment is that you will receive a notification from SARS containing an initial finding. For live shipments this will be an electronic notification received by the LSP (Logistics Service Provider).

          Disputing electronic notifications is more challenging.

          This was discussed in the former Blog (Knowing your Rights: The Customs Demand).

For post audits it will take the form of a Notice of Intent. A Notice of Intent is a notice of their (SARS) initial finding and their intention to issue a Letter of Demand. It provides the Trader with the ability to make representations to Customs. In a Notice of Intent you will generally be provided with a period of 7 or 14 days within which to respond. You do not need to pay any duties, VAT or penalties at this stage. You should assess the applicability of the Customs assessment and if in-applicable, you should write back to them with your own findings. It is extremely important to submit a well-motivated response during this early stage. It is also important to do so within the specified period of time. Failure to do so will result into a Letter of Demand being issued. You may request for an extension of the notice if you run out of time. Any win or termination of the process at this stage will result in the least intrusive consequence of the entire appeals process. If the result of the “reconsideration of decision” is not in your favour, you will then receive a Letter of Demand.

          In a Letter of Demand you will be expected to pay or alternatively to revert to litigation. In litigation you do not pay until such time as your case is formally lost in a court of law. However, it is generally advisable to engage in the SARS Customs appeals process prior to reverting to litigation.

          By choosing to appeal internally with SARS Customs you must first pay. In so doing, you are agreeing to abide by the Commissioners decision regardless of the outcome. However, there is a process of recourse for adverse decisions at every level of the appeals process. These will be discussed in the blog which follows.            

Knowing your Rights: Customs Searches

          It is a long known fact that Customs has being able to do just about anything when it comes to searches. The only requirements for them were that it had to be Customs related, legal and within reason.

          Customs was able to enter any building, request any document, conduct any search, and to open any records. They were and still are able to use force (including breaking and entering) within reason to gain access to products or information. All of this was allowed with no recourse by the property owner. In fact, till recently the Customs authorities were considered to be the one organ of state with the most powerful and far reaching powers of duties; more powerful than any police or public service no matter how special. Why, you may ask? Well, in the past, Customs did not need to provide written reasons for a search, nor were they required to produce a search warrant.

          While Customs is still able to do all of this, today they can no longer do so at free will. So what has changed?

Firstly, PAJA (Promotion of Administrative Justice Act) number 3 of 2000 was enacted. Without regurgitating the contents of the legislation, the basic premise according to the Act is… “To give effect to the right to administrative action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair and the right to written reasons for administrative action as contemplated in section 33 of the Constitution”. It basically means that prior to any administrative action taken by any Governmental agency including SARS Customs (i.e. not limited only to searches) that you have the right to be given reasons thereof, in writing. It also means that you have the right to be heard and to provide representations prior adherence to any administrative action. The following blogs will delve into the procedures that are generally followed by Customs which enable them to be administratively fair.

Secondly, it has to do with a legislative change which took place recently. The reasons for the legislative change came about as a result of a court action issued in the Western Cape. The court held that for searches to be constitutionally fair, a search warrant must, within reason, be obtained by the Customs authorities prior to any search. The old and the new Customs legislation now contain extensive clauses relating to search warrants. This includes all activities outside of a CCA (Customs Controlled Area), and outside of a Customs registered or licenced premises or a person. Warrantless access may still be gained upon reasonable explanation by Customs to the property owner. Explanations for such warrantless access must entail any real suspicion of breach of the legislation but where waiting for a warrant may take too long.

          But searches are different from simple requests by Customs for you to produce documents. In so doing they may visit your premises. There is therefore no reason why one should not allow Customs access in the ordinary course of business, so long as it is reasonable.